lnp logoLNP LOGO
Home Archive
Room
Loch Ness
Book
Explore
Loch Ness
Adrian
Shine
Media
Field
Research
Young
Loch Ness Explorers
Reflections
& Links
Contact
Us
Loch Ness
Centre

LOCH NESS PROJECT ARCHIVE OF RESEARCH AND INVESTIGATION AT LOCH NESS

Alphabetical Authors Index.

Simply a list and the quickest way to find a publication or study where the author is known. Links are provided where possible. University course dissertations are included, though links are currently to abstracts only. Copies are generally held by the Project Library  at Loch Ness 2000.

The Timeline.

Mainly the investigations of the Loch Ness Monster controversy and as its name suggests, is  a chronological history with the source references inserted and linked where possible. Because it is designed to show the evolution of method and thought, departures are made from the historical chronology where it seems relevant.
A List of Scientific Papers to Download from this Site

Emphasis on  geography and the general scientific research  which has been carried out at lochs Ness and Morar. Different aspects are drawn together and linked as above.

Some of the archives are pdf files and you will need ACROBAT READER which is free from the Adobe site -
GET ACROBAT READER
hUUse keyboard arrows to navigate and the magnifying tool to enlarge the view.

The archive is restricted to expeditions or other studies where authoritative reports or published papers have been produced. Thus, newspaper material is only used where it is authored by the investigators themselves and in one case where a newspaper reporter was himself a principal investigator.

Sometimes it has not been possible, for copyright or other reasons, to include an important item. Books, for example, or some journal publications have simply been referenced. For the same reason most items are reproduced in a PDF secure (read only) form. Where possible the material retains its original appearance but some is rearranged for screen viewing. If necessary, documents have been digitally retouched for legibility. The kind assistance given by the copyright holders is gratefully acknowledged.

Editorial bias: The inclusion of items mostly reflects whether material is considered "diligent" and it is hoped that no injustice has been done. The remaining scope for bias lies within those passages which attempt to link the pages of the archive and to demonstrate interaction or debate within them. These passages may reflect the author's personal opinions.


The Archive Room

"That which is strange is delightful, and a pleasing error is not willingly detected"

"Natural Philosophy is now one of the favourite studies of the Scottish nation and

Lough Ness well deserves to be diligently examined" 

Dr. Samuel Johnson 1775

These comments were written after a single ride along the shores of  Loch Ness in August 1773, yet together,  they  define the underlying dilemma of mystery in human society. All of us are drawn to mysteries, yet those most drawn, are those most likely to study them, understand them and ultimately perhaps, to explain them.

Dr. Johnson was not writing about Loch Ness Monsters; there is no evidence that he ever heard of them. He was actually showing scepticism about the loch's reputation for never freezing; just one of many mysteries addressed by those who were to answer his challenge. 

This archive, drawn from a century of remarkably "diligent" examination, aims to  draw together what has been placed on record by a  diverse range of researchers.

Loch Ness is of considerable intrinsic scientific interest as Britain's greatest volume of freshwater.  However, it is famous on account of the popular "monster" controversy.

It is the interplay between these two factors which has made the study of Loch Ness  unique. The editor does not differentiate between material that is scientific in  general and material that may be controversial in  particular. Those who have tilted at dragons have often been at pains to understand the environment they worked in, while general scientific discoveries have  shone unexpected light into the controversy.

Adrian Shine


Copyright this page : The Loch Ness Project

Loch Ness Project:Contact Adrian Shine

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loch Ness Archive of Authors, scientific papers and investigation